How to Avoid Invading Employee Privacy During Investigations
Conducting an investigation may involve some poking around, but if you cross the line from legitimate workplace concerns into private matters, you could be inviting a lawsuit.
Investigators deal with a lot of personal employee information during internal investigations. This poses one very obvious investigation risk: invading employee privacy.As an investigator, you need to know what activities are acceptable and which ones cross the line, in order to conduct a fair and legal investigation. This can become incredibly difficult for investigators, especially when they are investigating sensitive allegations, such as harassment or discrimination.
Investigators walk a fine line when deciding whether to share investigation information with interview subjects.
When conducting investigative interviews, a subject might make requests that require the investigator to choose between privacy and information accessibility. Are these requests acceptable? It depends. Learn more in this free webinar.Watch the Webinar
Why Does Privacy Matter in an Investigation?
Easy answer: lawsuits. If you cross the line in an investigation, you risk having the employee file a lawsuit against your company.In the book “The Essential Guide to Workplace Investigations,” by Lisa Guerin, she discusses what can happen if you invade employee privacy during an investigation:
“Don’t become so zealous in your search for the truth that you invade employees’ privacy rights. This can be a tough call, after all, conducting an investigation involves a certain amount of poking around, usually into things that someone doesn’t want you to know about. However, if you cross the line from legitimate workplace concerns into private employee property or behaviour, you could be inviting a lawsuit for invasion of privacy.If an employee files a lawsuit for invasion of privacy, a judge will look at why both sides acted as they did: why the employee expected privacy and why the employer searched, monitored or otherwise got into an area the employee felt was private.”