Industry Research: 3 Reasons Your HR Team Struggles with Employment Law Compliance

Employment law compliance can feel like a never-ending effort, and it’s even worse if you feel like your organization is falling behind. How do some companies make it look so easy?Whether or not compliance is your strong suit, it’s always interesting to learn best practices and opinions of your peers. That’s why we partnered with the HR Research Institute to survey over 200 HR professionals about how they deal with employment law compliance.Using the survey results, we’ve proposed three reasons your organization might be struggling with your HR compliance. Read them (plus ways to improve) below.

Your HR Compliance Program Lacks Maturity

Just 33 percent of survey respondents said that their organization’s compliance processes are highly mature; in other words, that their HR processes are clear, consistent, and understood by employees. On average, the larger their organization, the more likely a respondent was to say that their program was mature. This could be because larger companies often have more resources (both staff and budget) to commit to building and maintaining strong HR compliance procedures.So, what does program maturity (or lack thereof) look like, exactly? How can you improve without extra resources?First, mature organizations have a robust intake process. This should include at least one reporting mechanism (e.g., hotline, webform, dedicated email address) that is easy for employees to use. A hotline provides:

• Anonymity and Confidentiality: Employees can report concerns without fear of retaliation, as their identities are protected. This fosters a safe environment for reporting sensitive issues.
• Accessibility: Hotlines are always open, so reporters can speak up whenever it is most convenient for them. They also offer service in multiple languages and with accommodation for hearing- and vision-impaired reporters to ensure every caller can voice their concerns.
• Real-time Reporting: You'll receive and can act on hotline reports right away, so reporters don’t have to wait, and issues don’t have time to escalate.

With a proper intake process, you can decrease incident resolution time, reduce risk, and empower employees. When complaints don’t fall through the cracks, you’re less likely to be hit with non-compliance penalties or lawsuits.Next, mature organizations quickly and effectively triage reports as they receive them. Not every complaint warrants a formal investigation, and the triage process helps you decide which reports you can resolve in another way. This frees up time, effort, and money to put toward the cases that do need to be investigated.Compliance expert Tom Fox suggests rating reports on a threat level scale of one to five, with one having little effect on the organization and five involving “criminal liability.” The higher the threat level, the faster you need to respond and the more sophisticated the resolution process should be.Finally, efficient, consistent, and thorough investigations are a central part of a mature HR compliance program. Meric Bloch, Principal of Winter Compliance, says that a mature investigations process:

1. "Cannot just react to reports . . . [but] must look proactively to identify vulnerabilities that may enable future employee misconduct”
2. “Must consider the needs and perspectives of management, auditors, regulators, and stockholders”
3. “Thinks beyond 
the organization. What are other organizations doing? What industry benchmarks might help us?”
4. Considers “the regulatory framework in which the organization operates”
5. “Identifies contributing factors and unacceptable business risks . . . [to] contribute to the organization’s success”

You’re Not Using the Right (or any!) Technology

Not having the right tools can inhibit your processes from being as efficient and effective as they could be. Less than 40 percent of survey respondents feel that their employment law compliance processes are part of an integrated system, are highly automated, and use up to date technology. In addition, a Case IQ poll found that over 60 percent of case managers’ time is spent on manual tasks, using outdated spreadsheets or catch-all software.A purpose-built workplace case management system provides data-driven reports that help you manage risk, spot trends, and protect employees and the organization by preventing incidents, as well as fines and reputation damage. Home-grown or dated solutions (like spreadsheets) come with many challenges, including duplication of effort and information silos, security risks, and inconsistent documentation, opening your company up to fines and lawsuits. Case management software like Case IQ helps your team save time and money, ensure compliance, and reduce risk, all with one tool.Having tools that make investigative work easier and more consistent is not only beneficial to the investigator, but to the organization as a whole. For example, automating elements of case management (such as case assignment, workflow steps, and case creation) with case management software:

• Reduces human error
• Decreases response and resolution times
• Improves consistency and data accuracy
• Minimizes guesswork and assumptions
• Enhances collaboration between team members and external contributors (e.g., subject matter experts, consultants)
• Frees up valuable human resources for more complex tasks, including analysis and policy work

Case management software can also improve your HR and investigative teams’ efficiency, ensuring better employment law compliance. With all case information stored in one centralized platform, your team can close cases faster (no need to hunt down information and documents) and maintain a single source of truth. You can also integrate your tech stack, such as your HRIS, so you can easily fill in employee information without a lot of manual data entry. Finally, case management software keeps sensitive data secure, and user-based access helps you control who can see and work on each file. You can even track who did what to a case and when in its audit log, in case you’re challenged in court or by regulators.